THE STUDY OF EVIDENCE by Cathy D. Slaght
Yesterday our “words to ponder” were “All generalizations are false, including this one.”
Could this mean generalizing isn't necessarily a GOOD thing?
Things like -
“doctors know more about health than a layperson”
“governmental agencies exist to serve the people”
-along with generalizations about political parties, cultures, races, sexes and so on-
What would happen if we started collecting some evidence to support our generalizations?
An unpleasant example- I've been following the case of Darlie Routier- on death row for many years- accused of murdering her two young sons.
Friends say “how can you look at this stuff!” but I've always believed many are sent to death row unfairly. I saw this as such a case, so kept an eye on what was happening, prayed, and so on.
I couldn't imagine a beautiful young woman, with a loving family unit, capable of such a thing.
But I didn't stop looking at evidence- and recently learned something that led me to change my opinion.
And, while trying to write all this up in a way that made sense, a phone call came in from a friend.
She said “ I've been led to call you about something. When we first met you talked, with great passion, about the child sex trafficking going on in this country. I thought you were into conspiracies. Now I realize you were correct.”
She continued “ This information is now coming to the forefront, and it's going to be a HUGE shock to many. WHO ARE WE, and WHERE ARE WE GOING AS A CULTURE?”
Here's what I think- we're in the process of an awakening- and have the power to create positive change.
(but what I think doesn't matter- what do YOU think? That's the reality you'll create.)
While we're thinking along unpleasant lines- which sometimes is necessary- could it be there are corporate entities that want keep us in turmoil - physically, mentally, emotionally, spiritually- because it's a huge generation of power and profit?
Is it possible these same corporate entities control the mainstream media?
Is there any EVIDENCE of this?
Then, the phone rang again- what a day- so I asked the caller if I could read her this post before submitting- it was getting a little strange, and I knew she would be honest -.
Her response “While you're at it- labels need to be discussed. LABELS are SPELLS.
Oh Lord Have Mercy (old family expression, sometimes all that's appropriate except for the F word)
But I'll see what I can find.
Meanwhile, for today, details (etheric, not physical) of our session. Forgot to dowse in the code for jaw stress, did so after the screen cast.
And JAW STRESS- according to RECALL THERAPY- conflict of self-devaluation linked to words
Cathy D. Slaght